Dangerous Liaisons

I was staying with a friend not to long ago. It wasn’t long before RWBX and I was really exited! So to get into the spirit of things we watched the 2005 RWB DVD. Like my friend, BNP veterans will be aware that this particular RWB was somewhat overshadowed by the pending trials of our Nick Griffin and Mark Collett. In fact at this point the arrests were still fresh to mind. So it is only natural that it was this that formed the content of Mr Collett’s speech, in particular the circumstances of his arrest.

It was as Mr Collett described his arrest that, probably unbeknown to him, he posed an interesting philosophical question-is he [Mark Collett] really this frightening? (Apparently police in full riot gear attended his arrest!) Does Mr Collett realise the full implications of this proposition. To whom is Mr Collett appealing. Well initially the RWB, so a closed audience of BNP members, family and supporters. In this sense it is doubtful that this audience find Mr Collett in terms of a ‘traditional male’ remotely threatening. Yet is this the suggestion of the attendance by the fully clad riot police at Mr Collett’s arrest.

It may interest the readership to note that our ‘friends’ at HopeNotHate recently ‘outed’ Mr Collett as a red blooded male. I believe it was the pre-election leaflet The BNP View Of Women that reported Mr Collett at a Barnsley meeting “extolling his human right to ogle women in low cut tops”. Not suggesting that Mr Collett did or did not say these words. (BentNotStraight are notoriously bad note takers!) Anyway personally if it had been a BNP leaflet we are more likely to speak in terms of entitlement rather than human rights! The point here is that our liberal ‘friends’ are obviously threatened by a heterosexual male finding woman in low-cut tops sexually attractive. What we are really talking about here is human nature. I mean let’s be honest what do women in low-cut tops expect a red blooded male to do close his eyes!

Did you know human females are the only mammals whose glands protrude in such a fashion. I expect it is a sexual display. Other species have feathers or coloured scales etc. Now what we really should be asking ourselves is why women wear low-cut tops if not to display boobs. I ask you bras with underwire, and why create a strapless bra with cups like body armour if not to support a very tasteful low-cut top. In my opinion the end product does not deserve a burka thrown over it! It is hypocritical for one sex to flaunt its assets and expect the opposite sex not to respond in its natural way. Looking hurts no-one.

Having been ‘outed’ as an indigenous British heterosexual Mr Collett is really just observing his natural instinct. I suggest that instinct is base, animal. It is then expected that this is tempered by the civilised human. As such Mr Collett would not touch unless invited!

However, it would seem that this is not enough for our liberal ‘friends’. The personal checks and balances apparently cannot be relied upon in our ‘nu nanny state’. The European Heterosexual is just too threatening particularly to the so called fairer sex. It has become necessary in this liberal society to dumb down, effeminate or effectively emasculate the heterosexual male. Ideally convince him he is homosexual. In this way he ceases to be a threat. So when such people encounter an indigenous, British, heterosexual red-blooded male like Mr Collett they are terrified! Already ‘outed’ as the above threat what other flagrant acts of masculinity is he likely to unleash-rip open his shirt to reveal that he does not shave his chest. Or worse still go forth and multiply. What hideously white babies? My God this fiend should be tagged for all our safety!